Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Academics and course directors offer an insight into Oxford Medical Sciences undergraduate courses

Image courtesy of Shutterstock

Attracting the very best applicants from all parts of the UK remains a high priority for our undergraduate courses. With this in mind, Deputy Director of Pre-clinical Studies Prof. Chris Norbury explained the six-year Medicine and three-year Biomedical Sciences courses to a total of around 1,750 potential applicants at the Oxford-Cambridge Student Conferences, held across the country over two weeks in March. The four-year Biochemistry course was similarly covered by Kathryn Scott and Mark Wormald.

Each conference was a day-long event, with venues ranging from football stadia (St James' Park, Newcastle and the Liberty Stadium, Swansea) to race courses (Epsom and Aintree), and included sessions on student finance and how to make a competitive application, as well as subject-specific presentations and Q&A. Current undergraduates local to each area played key roles as 'student ambassadors', helping the school students attending the Conferences to appreciate that Oxbridge entry is an achievable goal.

Prof. Norbury commented: "The Conferences provide an efficient way of making direct contact with a substantial proportion of those year 12 students who are seriously thinking about applying for our courses. We were able to answer a wide range of questions from students and their teachers, and to offer encouragement to all those with a genuine interest in the science that makes medicine work. These events are organised jointly with Cambridge in a collaborative spirit, but informal feedback from participants suggests the Oxford courses were viewed very positively by comparison with their Cambridge counterparts!".

Similar stories

Communication at the crossroads of the immune system

In his inaugural article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences as an NAS member (elected 2021), Prof Mike Dustin and his research team in Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences have explained how messages are passed across the immunological synapse. The research could have implications for future vaccine development and immunotherapy treatments.

Oxford spinout trials revolutionary bioelectronic implant to treat incontinence

The first participants in a clinical trial of a bioelectrical therapy to treat incontinence have received their “smart” bioelectronic implants.

COVID-19 is a leading cause of death in children and young people in the US

A new study led by researchers at the University of Oxford’s Department of Computer Science has found that, between 2021 and 2022, COVID-19 was a leading cause of death in children and young people in the United States, ranking eighth overall. The results demonstrate that pharmaceutical and public health interventions should continue to be applied to limit the spread of the coronavirus and protect again severe disease in this age group.

Three or more concussions linked with worse brain function in later life

Experiencing three or more concussions is linked with worsened brain function in later life, according to new research.

New blood test could save lives of heart attack victims

Researchers in the Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics (DPAG) have developed a blood test that measures stress hormone levels after heart attacks. The test – costing just £10 – could ensure patients receive timely life-saving treatment.

COVID-19 increased public trust in science, new survey shows

A survey of over 2000 British adults has found that public trust in science, particularly genetics, increased significantly during the pandemic. However, those with extremely negative attitudes towards science tend to have high self-belief in their own understanding despite low textbook knowledge.