Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A new study led by researchers at Oxford Population Health has found no significant differences in growth up to two years of age between children who were exposed to HIV during pregnancy but remained uninfected and those born to mothers without HIV. The study is published in eClinicalMedicine.

The study compared the growth of 398 children at one year old and 286 children at two years old in Soweto, South Africa. Among them, 143 and 82 children respectively were HIV-exposed but uninfected (CHEU), while 255 and 204 were HIV-unexposed and uninfected (CHUU). The researchers assessed growth indicators using World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards: length-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, and head circumference-for-age.

Key findings:

  • CHEU tended to have slightly lower growth scores, these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for maternal and socioeconomic factors;
  • At one year of age, stunting (defined as length-for-age more than two standard deviations below the WHO standard mean) affected 29% of HIV-exposed and 19% of HIV-unexposed children, while by two years the rates were 19% and 21%, respectively;
  • The prevalence of underweight (weight-for-age more than two standard deviations below the mean) and wasting (weight-for-length more than two standard deviations below the mean) was similar across groups, though children exposed to HIV had a lower risk of overweight (weight-for-length more than two standard deviations above the mean) at two years old.

 

Read the full story on the Nuffield Department of Population Health website.

Similar stories