Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Advice on how general practice staff should talk to adult patients about behaviour change is common, but new research from the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences found that this behaviour-change communication guidance for general practice is rarely clearly substantiated with relevant evidence.

A horizontal image of a young male doctor sitting chatting to his patient. They are in a typically British doctor's practice chatting together, while he shows his patient her test results on the digital tablet.

How should clinicians talk to patients about changing their diet, stopping smoking, cutting down on alcohol, or becoming more physically active? Guidance on these conversations is everywhere - in national guidelines, training materials, journals and professional magazines. But how much of that advice is based on solid evidence? 

A new systematic review from researchers at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, published in BMC Medicine, examined guidance aimed at general practice professionals on how to communicate with adult patients about behaviour change, and then looked closely at the evidence used to support the guidance. 

The researchers identified 84 different sources of guidance, containing 1,163 specific recommendations about how clinicians should communicate.  

They then asked two simple questions: 

  1. Does this recommendation cite any evidence? 

  1. If it does, is that evidence actually relevant to the specific communication advice being given?