Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In a correspondence to Nature Medicine, a team of Oxford-led academics describe upcoming new guidelines to improve the reporting of early clinical stage (or first-with-human) evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence.

Red light with silhouette of a man

As an increasing number of clinical decision-support systems driven by artificial intelligence progress from development to implementation, better guidance on the reporting of human factors (ergonomics) and early-stage clinical evaluation is needed.

Therefore, Dr Baptiste Vasey and Professor Peter McCulloch from the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, together with a steering group of experts in the fields of machine learning, human factors, and guidelines development from Oxford University and other universities in the UK and abroad, aim to develop new guidelines to improve the reporting of the early-stage clinical evaluation of AI-based decision support systems.

“We are convinced that human clinicians should and will remain at the centre of patient care, and therefore aiming to improve the way in which AI-based clinical decision support systems are evaluated when used to enhance rather than replace human intelligence. A critical phase of this process is when such systems are assessed when first used by clinicians in real life settings,” says Dr Vasey.

The article outlines a Delphi process, comprising two rounds of experts’ feedback and one consensus meeting, and the rationale for the new Developmental and Exploratory Clinical Investigation of Decision support systems based on Artificial Intelligence (DECIDE-AI) guidelines being developed. The authors hope to address some of the important issues hindering the translation from in silico algorithm development to clinical impact.

Read the full story on the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences website

Similar stories

New evidence for how our brains handle surprise

A new study from the Bruno Group is challenging our perceptions of how the different regions of the cerebral cortex function. A group of ‘quiet’ cells in the somatosensory cortex that rarely respond to touch have been found to react mainly to surprising circumstances. The results suggest their function is not necessarily driven by touch, but may indicate an important and previously unidentified role across all the major cortices.

Language learning difficulties in children linked to brain differences

A new study using MRI has revealed structural brain changes in children with developmental language disorder (DLD), a common but under-recognised difficulty in language learning. Children with DLD aged 10-15 showed reduced levels of myelin in areas of the brain associated with speaking and listening to others, and areas involved in learning new skills. This finding is a significant advance in our understanding of DLD and these brain differences may explain the poorer language outcomes in this group.

The Gene Therapists Headline at Glastonbury 2022

Rosie Munday writes about her experience taking science to the masses at the Glastonbury Festival.

New research reveals relationship between particular brain circuits and different aspects of mental wellbeing

Researchers at the University of Oxford have uncovered previously unknown details about how changes in the brain contribute to changes in wellbeing.

Night-time blood pressure assessment is found to be important in diagnosing hypertension

Around 15% of people aged 40-75 may have a form of undiagnosed high blood pressure (hypertension) that occurs only at night-time. Because they do not know about this, and therefore are not being treated for it, they are at a higher risk of cardiovascular disease such as stroke, heart failure, and even death, suggests new research from the University of Oxford published in the British Journal of General Practice.